Reassessing and Redirecting Research on Race and Sentencing*
نویسندگان
چکیده
A large portion of research on criminal sentencing over the past few decades has focused on the role of defendant race. The modal approach has encompassed regression-based studies of whether defendant race exerts a main effect on imprisonment decisions. Recent studies have employed more sophisticated statistical models, have incorporated information on both race and ethnicity, and have increasingly emphasized a possible conditional role of these defendant attributes on sentencing outcomes. While these enhancements have yielded some noteworthy insights into how race and ethnicity may shape sentencing decisions, there are notable conceptual and methodological problems inherent in the modal research strategy that limit its overall utility. This paper takes stock of what we have learned to date from standard approaches to studying race and sentencing, outlines what appear to be the major underlying themes that have motivated that research, and proposes some new research directions that may help us to address those themes in different and possibly more direct ways.
منابع مشابه
Race , Sentencing , and the Pretrial Process
Title of Document: RACE, SENTENCING, AND THE PRETRIAL PROCESS Michelle Elizabeth Hart, Master of Arts, 2006 Directed By: Professor Shawn Bushway, Criminology and Criminal Justice Previous research has suggested that racial disparity originates from judicial decisions at sentencing; however I argue that racial disparity may originate at the pretrial stage. First, research has consistently demons...
متن کاملThe Effects of the Offender’s Race, Ethnicity, and Sex on Federal Sentencing Outcomes in the Guidelines Era
Social scientists have conducted dozens of studies designed to untangle the relationship between race and sentence severity. In fact, this issue “may well have been the major research inquiry for studies of sentencing in the 1970s and early 1980s.” Many of these early studies focused on the direct effect of race on sentencing, asking whether black, and occasionally Hispanic, offenders were sent...
متن کاملThirty Years of Sentencing Reform: The Quest for a Racially Neutral Sentencing Process
As we approach the 21st century, the issue of racial discrimination in sentencing continues to evoke controversy and spark debate. Some researchers contend that crimes by racial minorities are punished more harshly than similar crimes by equally culpable whites; others argue that racial disparities in sentence severity reflect differences in crime seriousness, prior criminal record, and other l...
متن کاملCommunity Context and Sentencing Decisions: a Multilevel Analysis
This dissertation uses data on a large sample of felony defendants processed in a nationally representative sample of large urban counties, in conjunction with data on the characteristics of the jurisdictions in which their cases were adjudicated, to examine the influence of community characteristics on sentencing decisions. Drawing on prior theoretical and empirical research, hierarchical line...
متن کاملConcerning Conceptualization and operationalization: Sentencing Data and the focal Concerns perspective— a research note
Although several theoretical perspectives have been used to study judicial discretion in the sentencing process, the focal concerns perspective has been one of the dominant theoretical frameworks used in the sentencing literature. The original work on focal concerns in sentencing revolved around the treatment of female defendants; this perspective has been expanded to include explanations of ra...
متن کامل